model – Movies of the Soul

Vampire Owl: What kind of substance would this be?

Vampire Bat: I am sure that this cannot be tea.

Vampire Owl: Well, tea is a substance.

Vampire Bat: I am sure that they are talking about some illegal substance.

Vampire Owl: There is a list related to that with killer names too.

Vampire Bat: I heard that there are vampires of substance.

Vampire Owl: Would they be related to this?

Vampire Bat: We cannot be sure about that.

Vampire Owl: This move still seems to be a very different in its approach.

Vampire Bat: Well, it was a much-appreciated movie, so we can trust it up to an extent.

[Gets a vegetable samosa and three cups of Darjeeling tea].

What is the movie about? :: Elisabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore), who has been one of the most wanted celebrities and models of her time, finds herself in a struggle and would soon be fired by her producer (Dennis Quaid) who finds her too old for the job that involves a lot of aerobics and exercise. She no longer has any role to play in Hollywood with everything that she had done in her youth immediately fading into an oblivion of forgetfulness, and the only people who seem to admire her are those classmates and old friends from a past when she used to look stunning in their eyes. She is distracted by these happenings, and crashes her crash, landing her in a hospital only to have a nurse provide her with a USB drive advertising an illegal drug known as “The Substance”, which comes with a promise of a much younger and more beautifully perfect version of oneself that aligns with the demands of the market around them. A killer body is indeed what she would need to rise like a phoenix from the ashes instead of descending into madness.

So, what happens with the events here as we just keep looking? :: Desperate to get to her days of beauty and glory, she buys the drug and injects herself with it only to find a young naked young lady coming out of her body. This seemingly perfect nude body would be known by the name Sue (Margaret Qualley), and living within the new skin, she finds each part of her to be flawless. Even though the old body becomes inactive, the two bodies must switch consciousness every seven days, with the inactive body remaining unconscious and fed. Daily injections of stabilizer fluid taken from the original body is required for the new body to remain the same without losing its parts. Sue becomes very popular with her new body appreciated by everyone including Harvey, while her photos in swimwear and bra and panties become sensation and part of many billboards, magazine covers and cutouts. She is chosen to prepare for a grand programme which is to follow, but it is to be seen if the new body will work perfectly for the same.

The defence of The Substance :: There is a strange beauty about the movie, and it is not just about the charm of the leading cast who manages so well. There is the ideal vision of beauty, and then there is the attempt to maintain the same while bringing out the worst in the process. Both the leading actresses seem to have put a lot of effort in their respective avatars, not just with the performances, but also with their bodies, which deserves all the appreciation. The birth of the new body sequence is one grand spectacle with a fantastic work from Margaret Qualley which nobody needs to miss – each and every sequence involving both these actresses seem to bring out the best from both. The final moments, even though happening just as expected, makes an impact and ends the idea of temporary beauty really well. One watches that and is reminded of the consequences of being fake and focusing only on the outside beauty, seeking glory and appreciation all the time while losing one’s soul in the process.

The claws of flaw :: The movie remains a complicated one and defies logic as one would expect, with the world going into an allegory, leaving the reality behind, as if to keep a message running out there with enough strength at all times. The ending of the movie is too much predictable, and there is no innovation or class added to that, which is a shame. The idea could have been brought about more logically, maybe with the right science fiction or fantasy elements, but the movie has chosen to just use a drug status instead. Instead of just taking the new face and body to fame, a tale about the process could have also added, but the storyline never really has any focus here, with things just happening and nobody caring about a lot of things which happens around. Even a random vampire romance movie made for teens would focus more about the story and could force better logic out of nowhere to satisfy even the least bothered fans. With such an addition, this movie could have even had a fine sequel at some point.

The performers of the soul :: It is Margaret Qualley’s performance that sets this movie apart, from that naked rebirth and look at her own body, to living like a dream, her expressions make the happenings feel so real. When she takes a shower, her focus on her nude body becomes a reminder that it not hers, and that this perfection is not something that she deserves. The way she looks at herself and others is a reminder of how much she gets into the character. There might be not many other people who would suit these perfect looks, as there seems to be not even a blemish in her performance or the appearance. Demi Moore is not far behind in being shocked and pleasantly surprised at her own new appearance, and the naked other that stays unconscious on her, never failing to appreciate her own perfect body reborn as another. We remember some of those special movies of her, and she maintains that charm. Dennis Quaid makes different quick impacts during his existence as a deciding factor in the movie.

How it finishes :: The Substance is that kind of a movie which you can watch for the underlying message about beauty, while also going through the beautiful people whom you witness throughout the run and not in a flash, especially Margaret Qualley coming up with a performance that will charm and haunt the viewers for a long time. There is never losing the idea about what the movie intends to convey, even when the focus on storyline and logic is lost. Being a body horror comedy with that message which makes no innovation, this is not the movie for everyone, that much we can be sure about. But with the divergence surely there, this is a film which we can watch for the variety it brings, even with so much predictability hidden within. The movie has been a much appreciated one, and it becomes the duty of most movie lovers to check out the reason behind the same.

Release date: 20th September 2024
Running time: 92 minutes
Directed by: Coralie Fargeat
Starring: Margaret Qualley, Demi Moore, Dennis Quaid, Edward Hamilton-Clark, Gore Abrams, Oscar Lesage, Christian Erickson, Robin Greer, Tom Morton, Hugo Diego Garcia, Yann Bean

]

<<< Click here to go to the previous review.

@ Cemetery Watch
✠ The Vampire Bat.

Vampire Owl: Have you read The Portrait of a Lady by Henry James?

Vampire Bat: Yes, I had read that novel as a part of writing an assignment during my English Language and Literature post graduation.

Vampire Owl: What would adding some fire to the title mean?

Vampire Bat: I don’t think that this has any relation with it. This one is actually French. This is not Korean or Chinese for a change. Let this burn bright!

Vampire Owl: So, the portrait is not really the portrait that one might be led to believe it is. I would still choose a Polaroid camera instead.

Vampire Bat: It was about a young woman who inhered a large amount of money, and becoming prey to some scheming.

Vampire Owl: I have heard about the author, but most of the people I know haven’t.

Vampire Bat: Well, he hasn’t been writing the kind of works, the vampires have been reading, and so its natural not to know.

Vampire Owl: So, you are now choosing French.

Vampire Bat: Yes, we have been going further international these days.

[Gets a vancho cake and three cups of masala tea].

What is the movie about? :: The story is set at some time period during the end of the late eighteenth century. Marianne (Noemie Merlant) is a young painter who takes painting classes to her eager students. As she makes them paint her portrait, one of her students asks her about a special painting from her, which Marianne used to call Portrait de la jeune fille en feu. It takes us back to the origins of that particular painting, and the same has a close relationship with Marianne’s past and her emotional side. Once upon a time, Marianne was called to an isolated island in Brittany in the west of France, to paint a portrait of a young woman named Heloise (Adele Haenel) by her mother The Countess (Valeria Golino). Marianne struggles to reach there, as she herself, and the canvas falls into the sea on her way.

So, what happens with the events here? :: There, she meets Sophie (Luana Bajrami), a beautiful young girl who works as the servant to the Countess and her daughter. They become good friends, and comes to know that Heloise was at the convent, and was forced to come back to marry a wealthy Italian nobeleman because her sister had died, supposed to have jumped off a cliff. Now, this portrait is to be sent to that possible husband of Heloise as soon as possible. The Countess says that her daughter was not ready to pose in front of any painter, and so Marianne will have to pretend that she was someone who had come to accompany her during her walks, to get rid of her boredom. It seemed to be the only way for her, and Marianne started being friends with Heloise who arrived there. She also started observing Heloise enough to paint her in parts. But there will be more than just a painting that we will be having here.

The defence of Portrait of a Lady on Fire :: There is some beautiful serenity that runs through this movie and its silence which serves more than anything else, as the main actresses really make a lovely impact with their expressions and body language itself, getting us immersed into this tale set in the late eighteenth century Brittany. The setting is incredibly beautiful, making you wish to make a visit, and one wonders where this particular island stands in history. This environment created as part of this movie is a charming one, but it is also a very simple one – it is not that usually colourful world from a grand historical past as we usually see in historical drama, action or thriller movies. We go through the eyes of an artist who is not just a painter, but someone with intimate feelings which she seems to have gained in connection to her work on the canvas – it reflects there as much as it shows up in her soul.

The claws of flaw :: Portrait of a Lady on Fire is a very slow movie, as you might have expected it from the talks about it, and also by what you have further read about the same. The movie also has some moments which are not utilized the best, especially related to the artistic work, the painting. The focus could have been more on that painting, and the artists feelings should have been above the person’s intimacy. There is also a lot of time taken in the beginning, and in between, which is felt more because of the movie’s slow pace. There could have also been some more characters to provide support, and this movie’s viewpoints are rather limited when you look at it. There is a lot of silence and a good number of dialogues, but there is less happening for the people who are looking for that as the thing which defines a movie – after all, this is close to being what you call the award movie in this part of the world. Two hours were not needed for this movie for sure.

Performers of the soul :: Portrait of a Lady on Fire is a movie nominated for Golden Palm, the highest prize awarded at the Cannes Film Festival, where it lost to the Korean Oscar Winner, Parasite, and so you know that this one had to score in its performances more than anything else. It has to be noted that all the main characters in this movie are female, and you see some men for that amount of time which can be better counted using seconds rather than minutes. The movie is that much dependent on its female characters, especially the two main ladies, with more to be added from a third young character, and a little more from the much older character who plays the mother. I haven’t watched many French movies, but Noemie Merlant is the one lovely actress who has come up with a perfect performance here which cannot be matched. She has been very expressive, and very much enchanting as the painter, closely followed by Adele Haenel who manages almost the same. Luana Bajrami, the next important character is done well, and Valeria Golino is there for less time, and does fine.

How it finishes :: The movie is not to be confused with The Portrait of a Lady by Henry James, as the title only has the addition of fire in the end, which might have been enough to prove its point. But people are more or less attracted into feeling that this is the same thing, and only the fact that this is not a British or American movie making them feel that this is something else. But the movie is not a lesser classic when you look at it, as it feels like an old-fashioned throughout its run. It is a slow-moving thing of charm, which makes sure that the moments are there to stay. Portrait of a Lady on Fire is more or less a feeling set in that historical period, and it has that delicate beauty with the realistic touch which is to stay for the beauty of tranquility, and not for what we usually remember a movie for. Portrait of a Lady on Fire takes you through the different, classic path.

Release date: 18th September 2019
Running time: 120 minutes
Directed by: Celine Sciamma
Starring: Noemie Merlant, Adele Haenel, Luana Bajrami, Valeria Golino